Relative Eyes (Biological Limits of Perception)
Relative Eyes explains why we don’t fully understand reality.
Not because reality is hidden, but because our biology limits what we can see and understand.
All science is built on observation.
All observation is done by living beings.
Living beings have limits.
Because of that, science itself has limits.
How We Reached This Idea
We started with a simple question:
If different living beings see the world differently, which view is correct?
Biology already shows us that:
Some animals see colors we can’t
Some sense vibrations, fields, or chemicals we can’t
Some react to time and motion differently than we do
Yet all of them live in the same universe.
This means that what we experience is not “reality itself”, but reality filtered by our biology.
No living being in this universe can see the universe as it is, and no mathematical equations based on the effects of the universe will explain the universe.
The Core Idea
Relative Eyes says:
What we observe depends on how we are built
Our senses do not show everything that exists
Our brain fills in gaps to make the world usable, not complete
So what we call “reality” is:
useful
consistent
but incomplete
Science describes what we can observe. It does not describe everything that exists, and it never will, because observation and experimentation are conducted by biased biological beings.
Simple Examples
Example 2: Hearing and Vibration
Humans hear a narrow range of sound.
Dogs hear higher frequencies
Whales communicate across vast distances underwater
Some animals feel vibrations instead of hearing sound
The same environment produces very different experiences depending on the observer.
Example 3: Electric and Magnetic Fields
Some animals can sense electric or magnetic fields.
Sharks detect electric signals from other organisms
Birds sense Earth’s magnetic field to navigate
Humans need instruments to detect these effects.
Without tools, these parts of reality would remain invisible to us.
Example 4: Time and Motion
Even among humans, perception changes:
Fast motion can look smooth or broken
Slow changes often go unnoticed
Reaction time affects what feels “real‑time”
This shows that perception is tied to biological processing speed, not reality itself.
Reality does not change, but how it is experienced does.
Different living beings observe the same universe in very different ways.
This is not speculation — it is already visible in biology.
Example 1: Vision and Light
Humans see only a small part of light.
We cannot see infrared or ultraviolet
Many animals can
To us, those parts of reality do not exist visually. To them, they are part of everyday experience.
The light was always there.
Our biology just cannot see it.
Why This Matters for Science
Science depends on observation.
If observation depends on biology, then:
Science describes what we can detect
Not everything that exists
This helps explain why science:
Works extremely well
But does not fully unify
And leaves deeper structures unexplained
Connection to the Medium
The Medium Hypothesis describes where physical effects happen.
If there is a deeper structure behind physical effects (the medium), then:
Biological senses are not designed to detect it
Observation alone will never reach it
Physical experiments is part of the medium effect itself, therefore, it becomes complex to detect the medium using the medium effects
Reality is not limited. Observation and experiments are.
Relative Eyes explains why science cannot fully describe reality using biological observation alone. The medium explains why physical experiments are also not enough, and why going beyond biological observation and physical experimentation is necessary to reach deeper layers of nature.
Why the Medium Is Hard to Detect
All physical experiments are performed inside the medium.
That means:
Experiments measure effects happening in the medium
Instruments are built from those same effects
Observations are limited to what the medium allows to appear
So when we try to study the medium using physical experiments, we are using the medium to study itself. This creates a limitation.
Physical experiments do not observe the medium directly. They observe what the medium produces.
This is similar to:
Studying water only by watching waves
Studying air only by watching wind
Studying a screen only by looking at the images on it
The effects are real and measurable, but they are not the structure that produces them.
