Relative Eyes (Biological Limits of Perception)

Relative Eyes explains why we don’t fully understand reality.

Not because reality is hidden, but because our biology limits what we can see and understand.

  • All science is built on observation.

  • All observation is done by living beings.

  • Living beings have limits.

Because of that, science itself has limits.

How We Reached This Idea

We started with a simple question:

If different living beings see the world differently, which view is correct?

Biology already shows us that:

  • Some animals see colors we can’t

  • Some sense vibrations, fields, or chemicals we can’t

  • Some react to time and motion differently than we do

Yet all of them live in the same universe.

This means that what we experience is not “reality itself”, but reality filtered by our biology.

No living being in this universe can see the universe as it is, and no mathematical equations based on the effects of the universe will explain the universe.

The Core Idea

Relative Eyes says:

  • What we observe depends on how we are built

  • Our senses do not show everything that exists

  • Our brain fills in gaps to make the world usable, not complete

So what we call “reality” is:

  • useful

  • consistent

  • but incomplete

Science describes what we can observe. It does not describe everything that exists, and it never will, because observation and experimentation are conducted by biased biological beings.

Simple Examples

Example 2: Hearing and Vibration

Humans hear a narrow range of sound.

  • Dogs hear higher frequencies

  • Whales communicate across vast distances underwater

  • Some animals feel vibrations instead of hearing sound

The same environment produces very different experiences depending on the observer.

Example 3: Electric and Magnetic Fields

Some animals can sense electric or magnetic fields.

  • Sharks detect electric signals from other organisms

  • Birds sense Earth’s magnetic field to navigate

Humans need instruments to detect these effects.
Without tools, these parts of reality would remain invisible to us.

Example 4: Time and Motion

Even among humans, perception changes:

  • Fast motion can look smooth or broken

  • Slow changes often go unnoticed

  • Reaction time affects what feels “real‑time”

This shows that perception is tied to biological processing speed, not reality itself.

Reality does not change, but how it is experienced does.

Different living beings observe the same universe in very different ways.

This is not speculation — it is already visible in biology.

Example 1: Vision and Light

Humans see only a small part of light.

  • We cannot see infrared or ultraviolet

  • Many animals can

To us, those parts of reality do not exist visually. To them, they are part of everyday experience.

The light was always there.
Our biology just cannot see it.

Why This Matters for Science

Science depends on observation.

If observation depends on biology, then:

  • Science describes what we can detect

  • Not everything that exists

This helps explain why science:

  • Works extremely well

  • But does not fully unify

  • And leaves deeper structures unexplained

Connection to the Medium

The Medium Hypothesis describes where physical effects happen.

If there is a deeper structure behind physical effects (the medium), then:

  • Biological senses are not designed to detect it

  • Observation alone will never reach it

  • Physical experiments is part of the medium effect itself, therefore, it becomes complex to detect the medium using the medium effects

Reality is not limited. Observation and experiments are.

Relative Eyes explains why science cannot fully describe reality using biological observation alone. The medium explains why physical experiments are also not enough, and why going beyond biological observation and physical experimentation is necessary to reach deeper layers of nature.

Why the Medium Is Hard to Detect

All physical experiments are performed inside the medium.

That means:

  • Experiments measure effects happening in the medium

  • Instruments are built from those same effects

  • Observations are limited to what the medium allows to appear

So when we try to study the medium using physical experiments, we are using the medium to study itself. This creates a limitation.

Physical experiments do not observe the medium directly. They observe what the medium produces.

This is similar to:

  • Studying water only by watching waves

  • Studying air only by watching wind

  • Studying a screen only by looking at the images on it

The effects are real and measurable, but they are not the structure that produces them.