Modern science usually treats geometry as a tool used to describe physical systems — coordinates, shapes, equations, and measurements applied after physical laws are already assumed to exist.

Our work explores a different possibility:

Geometry may exist before physics, not because of physics.

The Core Idea

Instead of space, time, energy, and matter creating structure, we investigate whether structural constraints themselves make physical behavior possible.

In this view:

• Geometry is not a measurement system

• Geometry is not a human abstraction

• Geometry is a limiting structure reality cannot violate

Physics may operate within these limits, rather than defining them.

Why Geometry Comes First

Physical laws describe behavior:

• How things move

• How they interact

• How energy behaves

But all of these behaviors already assume:

• Dimensional structure

• Spatial relationships

• Continuity or discreteness

• Constraints on transformation

These assumptions are geometric in nature.

This suggests that geometry is not derived from physics — physics is constrained by geometry.

Geometry and Physical Limits

Many limits in physics appear as fixed rules:

• Maximum speeds

• Conservation laws

• Allowed interactions

• Stability conditions

Physics can describe these limits very well, but it does not explain why these limits exist at all.

If geometry acts as a pre‑physical constraint, then:

• Limits are structural, not arbitrary

• Laws are outcomes, not starting points

• Constants reflect allowed structure

This reframes physical laws as responses to deeper constraints.

Geometry Before Forces

In standard thinking: Forces shape matter and motion.

In this framework: Geometric constraints determine which forces and motions are even possible.

• Motion exists because structure allows change.

• Interaction exists because structure allows relation.

• Stability exists because structure restricts collapse.

Physics becomes a behavioral layer, not the foundation.

Why This Helps Unification

Different sciences rely on different assumptions:

• Physics assumes spacetime and forces

• Chemistry assumes bonding rules

• Biology assumes structure and replication

• Information science assumes patterns and relations

Geometry is one of the few concepts shared across all of them.

By treating geometry as pre‑physical:

• Scientific fields can connect without reducing one into another

• Structural gaps between disciplines become visible

• Unification becomes structural, not forced